Current:Home > StocksFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -FinanceMind
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Oliver James Montgomery View
Date:2025-04-06 12:16:19
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Donate Your Body To Science?
- Here Are All of the Shows That Have Been Impacted By the WGA Strike 2023
- Isle of Paradise 51% Off Deal: Achieve and Maintain an Even Tan All Year Long With This Gradual Lotion
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Metalloproteins? Breakthrough Could Speed Algae-Based Fuel Research
- Allergic To Cats? There's Hope Yet!
- Today’s Climate: July 22, 2010
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Congress Punts on Clean Energy Standards, Again
Ranking
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Today’s Climate: July 13, 2010
- Real Housewives' Kim Zolciak and Kroy Biermann Break Up After 11 Years of Marriage
- Emma Coronel Aispuro, wife of El Chapo, moved from federal prison in anticipation of release
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Henry Winkler Shares He Had Debilitating Emotional Pain After the End of Happy Days
- Pruitt Announces ‘Secret Science’ Rule Blocking Use of Crucial Health Research
- Emma Coronel Aispuro, wife of El Chapo, moved from federal prison in anticipation of release
Recommendation
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
How to Clean Your Hairbrush: An Easy Guide to Remove Hair, Lint, Product Build-Up and Dead Skin
Why pediatricians are worried about the end of the federal COVID emergency
In close races, Republicans attack Democrats over fentanyl and the overdose crisis
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
With Some Tar Sands Oil Selling at a Loss, Why Is Production Still Rising?
Suburbs delivered recent wins for Georgia Democrats. This year, they're up for grabs
Precious memories: 8 refugees share the things they brought to remind them of home